Ryotaro Matsumura vs Braden Shick Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 29 Oct at 02:47 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
R. Matsumura vs B. Shick

 JPN
0
Win
Played
1
Win

 USA
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Matsumura 0 - 1 Shick
They have played 2 sets in total, with Ryotaro Matsumura winning 0 and Braden Shick winning 2. The last match between Braden Shick and Ryotaro Matsumura was at the M15 Yanagawa City, 29-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Braden Shick getting the victory 6-2 3-0 ret..
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins | 
|---|---|
| Matsumura | 0 | 
| Shick | 1 | 
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Yanagawa City(10-29-25)
R. Matsumura vs B. Shick H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 | 
| 60.93% (131-84) | Career Total W/L | 57.53% (42-31) | 
| 0 | Hard | 1 | 
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 | 
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) | 
R. Matsumura vs B. Shick Match Preview:
- Recent form shows Braden Shick has a slight edge in second serve performance, winning 46.26% compared to Ryotaro Matsumura's 44.50%. Could this impact the outcome?
- When it comes to returning second serves, Matsumura holds an advantage with 45.50% win rate, while Shick stands at 41.70%.
- However, Shick takes a lead in first serve return points, achieving 24.28% over Matsumura's 20.80%.
- Under pressure, Shick excels by saving 50.00% of breakpoints, outpacing Matsumura's 42.37%.
- Shick's overall performance in the past year is superior, with a 56.67% win rate, compared to Matsumura's 50.00%.
- Analyzing surface preferences, both exhibit their best win percentages at 71% on respective surfaces: Matsumura on Indoor hard and Shick on Clay. Both struggle most on Hard, with Shick at 53% and Matsumura slightly higher at 60%.
- Question: Does event level experience play a role? Matsumura has average tournament outcomes, winning 50% at the ITF Futures/Satellites level, while Shick fares better with 61.54%.
- Matsumura competes against higher-ranked opponents, holding a tougher average rank of 231.56 versus Shick's 334.7.
- In potential deciding set scenarios, Matsumura hasn't won any in the past year, while Shick’s 38% success rate is notable.
Editorial Prediction (October 29, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing the key performance metrics and both players' recent records underscores a competitive battle ahead. Braden Shick emerges with a slight advantage due to stronger serve and breakpoint defense, paired with a resilience in deciding sets.
His superiority in recent match-winning percentage and experience against comparable ranked opponents may provide greater confidence in crucial match points. Although Ryotaro Matsumura displays commendable return strengths, these alone might not counterbalance Shick's overall consistency.
Therefore, based on current data trends and comparative assessments, Braden Shick shows a higher likelihood of securing victory in this forthcoming tennis face-off.
Ryotaro Matsumura vs Braden Shick Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
R. Matsumura vs B. Shick H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 | 
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 | 
| 2 | Games Won | 9 | 
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 3 | 
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 1 | 
| 1:15:41 | Average Match Time | 1:15:41 | 
| 50% (18/36) | 1st Serve % | 74% (40/54) | 
| 22% (4/18) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (25/40) | 
| 56% (10/18) | 2nd Serve Win % | 64% (9/14) | 
| 9% (1/11) | Break Pts Won % | 40% (4/10) | 
| 37% (20/54) | Return Points Win % | 61% (22/36) | 
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) | 
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) | 
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 
Recent Performance Stats
R. Matsumura Recent Matches Played
B. Shick Recent Matches Played

R. Matsumura vs B. Shick Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60.93% (131/84) | YTD Win/Loss | 57.53% (42/31) | 
| 60.55% (287/187) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.69% (90/66) | 
| 55.64% (2344/1869) | Games Win/Loss | 53.70% (777/670) | 
| 59.26% (96/66) | Hard Win/Loss | 55.36% (31/25) | 
| 63.41% (26/15) | Clay Win/Loss | 66.67% (4/2) | 
| 75.00% (9/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 63.64% (7/4) | 
| 0.12 | Aces Per Game | 0.28 | 
| 257 | Aces Total | 200 | 
| 0.07 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 | 
| 148 | Total Double Faults | 110 | 
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:2:55 | 
| 345.52 | Average Opponent Rank | 286.86 | 
| 62% (4012/6509) | 1st Serve % | 57% (1660/2890) | 
| 63% (2513/4012) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (1154/1660) | 
| 50% (1245/2497) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (618/1230) | 
| 42% (310/741) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (112/260) | 
| 42% (2742/6572) | Return Points Win % | 38% (1068/2812) | 
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) | 
| 33.33% (1/2) | Challenger W/L | 16.67% (1/5) | 
| 61.32% (130/82) | Futures W/L | 62.12% (41/25) | 
| 61% (128/210) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (41/71) | 
| 53% (19/36) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (10/20) | 
| 43% (21/49) | Deciding Set Win % | 42% (5/12) | 
| 90% (130/117) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 93% (42/39) | 
| 10% (130/13) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 7% (42/3) | 
| 16% (85/14) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 10% (31/3) | 












